Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Now in print: The Bell Curve 2.0 reviewed



You may have thought Charles Murray was somnolent, in a quasi-academic back room of the American Enterprise Institute. And, how wrong you would be.br /br /a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjbFx2nOTDHi9HNJvXBYQ0zOcwZ6emB6lYRuXCmMvfGBh04NixHtjSZOzamJeED9MKhvcLACJyJyM1e5TASA7s2sq9L2Bd32JNI9mPoGwAn5TcZGg5lgxlBSjiaaBw87vKZKmj4QlpeXpk/s1600-h/TheBellCurve2.jpg"img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 267px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjbFx2nOTDHi9HNJvXBYQ0zOcwZ6emB6lYRuXCmMvfGBh04NixHtjSZOzamJeED9MKhvcLACJyJyM1e5TASA7s2sq9L2Bd32JNI9mPoGwAn5TcZGg5lgxlBSjiaaBw87vKZKmj4QlpeXpk/s400/TheBellCurve2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5349629615178099426" //a For the past several years, Murray has been working on a shocking sequel to his shocking-enough book about race and intelligence, “The Bell Curve.”br /br /Murray worked on the book from two angles, both designed to try to refute his critics, who said he woefully underestimated environmental influences of various types on expressions of intelligence, as well as the class-based structure of common IQ tests.br /br /Murray’s first angle was to look at class and intelligence. Believing that America is still today a relatively classless society, he decided to go to the most class-based Western nation he could find — Great Britain. To “blind” his analysis, he decided to look at people moving from class-based Great Britain to the United States.br /br /Murray’s second angle was to analyze people from a clearly genetically-controlled population, one readily definable and not subject to social changed. For a man not afraid of controversy, homosexuals made an ideal population group.br /br /Looking at homosexuals moving from Great Britain to the United States, with a focus on intelligence, Murray naturally had Andrew Sullivan squarely in his cross-hairs.br /br /Of course, a reputable researcher would recognize a huge conflict of interest was involved since Sullivan, when editor of iThe New Republic,/i forced his broadly and highly supportive view of Murray’s “blacks are naturally dumb” thesis down the throat of TNR editorial staff, eventually coming close to wrecking the magazine before, ironically, seeing it become a breeding ground of neoconservative bedbugs, known to constantly crawl over Sullivan’s later foreign-policy commentary.br /br /No matter.br /br /Murray thought he could attain more than sufficient detachment to continue the study. And he did.br /br /To the point of producing results that stunned him.br /br /An outside observer probably could have told Murrray, based on Sullivan’s uncritical TNR support of his original book, just how uniquely and self-blindly stupid Sullivan could be at times.br /br /But, Murray wasn’t convinced until his own studies showed him iSully was more self-delusionally stupid than anything Murray thought he had shown about blacks in “The Bell Curve.”/ibr /br /And, you, my friends, see pictured at left the published results of Murray’s latest and greatest research.div class="blogger-post-footer"There is no god and I am his prophet.img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7532871-8965476560473149858?l=socraticgadfly.blogspot.com'//div

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

No comments: