From a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/29/AR2009062901608.html"The Washington Post:/abr /br /br /br /br /blockquotestrongCourt rules for white firefighters over promotionsbr /By MARK SHERMANbr /The Associated Pressbr /Monday, June 29, 2009; 11:19 AM/strongbr /br /WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.br /br /New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said Monday in a 5-4 decision. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.br /br /The ruling could alter employment practices nationwide and make it harder to prove discrimination when there is no evidence it was intentional.br /br /"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.br /br /In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the white firefighters "understandably attract this court's sympathy. But they had no vested right to promotion. Nor have other persons received promotions in preference to them."br /br /Justices Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens signed onto Ginsburg's dissent, which she read aloud in court Monday. /blockquotebr /br /br /br /Rest of article at link above.br /br /Of course, we know which way Unca Clarence voted.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/21083673-2481786015080314748?l=mirroronamerica.blogspot.com'//div
technorati tags:
political news | news | world news
More at: News 2 Cromley
No comments:
Post a Comment