Friday, October 31, 2008

The Ground Game



One of the best websites of this political season has been FiveThirtyEight.com. I became addicted to it, when the owner, Nate Silver, would publish under the penname - Poblano. His accuracy in polling became almost legendary this political season.

One of the best series that they've had going has been " On the Road" series. Nate's fellow blogger has traveled the country, giving on the ground field reports on what they see at rival Obama and McCain offices. It has been illuminating.

Here is their latest entry, summing up their opinion of the Obama vs. McCain ground games.

The Big Empty

Friday, October 31, 2008
The Big Empty


As the only reporter during this election who has actually visited upwards of 50 of John McCain's field offices around the country (13 battleground states and counting), this piece by Matthew Mosk at the Washington Post comes as no surprise:


The decision to finance a final advertising push is forcing McCain to curtail spending on Election Day ground forces to help usher his supporters to the polls, according to Republican consultants familiar with McCain's strategy.

The vaunted, 72-hour plan that President Bush used to mobilize voters in 2000 and 2004 has been scaled back for McCain. He has spent half as much as Obama on staffing and has opened far fewer field offices. This week, a number of veteran GOP operatives who orchestrate door-to-door efforts to get voters to the polls were told they should not expect to receive plane tickets, rental cars or hotel rooms from the campaign.

"The desire for parity on television comes at the expense of investment in paid boots on the ground," said one top Republican strategist who has been privy to McCain's plans. "The folks who will oversee the volunteer operation have been told to get out into the field on their own nickel."


The busiest McCain office we saw was in Arlington, at the national HQ, but tight security prevented us from getting any pictures. Ironically, that was our first full office, in our 11th battleground state.

Offices in Troy, Ohio were closed on Saturday October 11. With perfect coincidental timing, two elderly women dropped by to volunteer but found the office shut. At Republican state headquarters in Columbus later the same day, one lonely dialer sat in a sea of unoccupied chairs. In Des Moines on September 25, another empty office. In Santa Fe on September 17, one dialer made calls while six chatted amongst themselves about how they didn't like Obama. In Raleigh this past Saturday, ten days before the election with early voting already open, two women dialed and a male staffer watched the Georgia-LSU game. In Durango, Colorado on September 20, the Republican office was locked and closed. Indiana didn't have McCain Victory offices when we were there in early October.

When the offices are open, they have reduced hours. We can confidently plan to get evening good-light photographs of a town after we visit the local McCain office, because we know it will be closing by 5 pm, as the office in Wilmington, North Carolina was this past Sunday. The plan is, get to inevitably closed/closing McCain office, get an hour of photos near sunset, then visit the bustling local Obama office.

In Cortez, CO, we had Republican volunteers pose for action-shot photos. The same in Española, New Mexico. Posed. For some time at the outset, we were willing to give Republicans the benefit of the doubt. They convinced us they were really working, and that we had just had unfortunate timing. It wasn't until the pattern of "just missed it" started to sound like a drumbeat in our ears that we began to grow skeptical. We never "just missed" any of the Obama volunteer work, because it goes on nonstop, every day, in every office, in every corner of America.

We found scattered nuggets of activity. Colorado Springs, Colorado held eight dialers and two front office volunteers. Albemarle County, Virginia had a busy office of 15 volunteers, and we reported that. Last night in Tampa, nine phonebankers were busy dialing at the Republican Party of Florida Hillsborough County HQ when we arrived at 8:00 pm. Seven dialers sat in McCain's Hickory, North Carolina office this past Saturday afternoon.

Those offices seemed busy to us, naturally, because they were explosively full relative to other offices we've stopped in on. But even the Colorado Springs office was dwarfed by the Obama Colorado Springs operation.

These ground campaigns do not bear any relationship to one another. One side has something in the neighborhood of five million volunteers all assigned to very clear and specific pieces of the operation, and the other seems to have something like a thousand volunteers scattered throughout the country. Jon Tester's 2006 Senate race in Montana had more volunteers -- by a mile -- than John McCain's 2006 presidential campaign.

When Republican volunteers talk to us about how much enthusiasm and participation they notice in fellow volunteers, they mention how many people have come to pick up yard signs or bumper stickers. We haven't yet seen a single Republican canvasser. (The one in Cortez, CO was staged; she said canvassing is the kind of thing she would do, and we made a decision to do the picture because we were concerned with not presenting "balance." There is no balance in the facts.)

When we attempted to visit the Republican HQ in Maryland Heights, Missouri, we saw a couple volunteers populating the office, and we were subsequently denied the opportunity to even speak to volunteers specifically selected so as to be "on message." By contrast, Obama's volunteers own such a piece of the campaign (Respect-Empower-Include) that the problem is they often have too much information, and when the campaign allows me to talk with them on the record I can ask a too-precise series of questions that result in publishing details the campaign later realizes it didn't want published.

We read the published comments from McCain spokespeople that argue the dialing/canvassing numbers are ahead of where they were at the same time four years ago. Well, either the Bush ground game of 2004 was the Big Myth, or those spokespeople are flat lying to reporters, who have no context to challenge those claims because they haven't seen the empty offices the way we have.

When the final chapters are written in this election about the ground game, many thousands of words will recognize that the Obama campaign truly was this:

But the other story, the story on which we've had a running eight-week exclusive in 36 separate On the Road pieces and counting, is that John McCain's ground campaign is just not happening. It hasn't been happening, without Sarah Palin there might be four or five volunteers across the entire nation left, and now, per Mosk's piece at WaPo, it looks like it will be happening even less.

--Sean Quinn


Please click on the piece and look at the pictures. Please read some of the series; it's been superb.

I'm not counting any chickens, I'm only stating my belief that the Obama Campaign has truly tried their best to win this thing; but, this is the time when they need US the most. WE are Get.Out.The.Vote.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Reagan's Chief Of Staff Endorses OBAMA



Read about it here:
Former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein told CNN's Fareed Zakaria this week he intends to vote for Democrat Barack Obama on Tuesday.

Duberstein said he was influenced by another prominent Reagan official - Colin Powell - in his decision.

"Well let's put it this way - I think Colin Powell's decision is in fact the good housekeeping seal of approval on Barack Obama."

I'm just sayin'

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Night of the Living Dead Voter



See Nader's funny video ad take on theclaims to change of both duopoly candidates.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Studs Terkel



R.I.P.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Liveblogging Cedar Hill-Grand Prairie football



Given the expected outcome of this game, don't expect me to be too regular here in the second half.

That said, if Cedar Hill wins tonight, the Longhorns clinch the District 7-5A title at home.

And, the Horns have a clock-chewing 17-play TD drive to open the game.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Creepy



Jonah Goldberg wants "non-culty Obama supporters" to admit that it's "creepy" when a man -- driven to desperation for who knows what reason -- throws himself off a bridge and allegedly leaves a note behind asking Barack Obama to take care of his family.

Call me a liberal fascist, but I find the details of an anonymous man's suicide substantially less creepy than someone who uses it as an opportunity to remind everyone that some dirty fucking hippie once called Obama a "lightworker."

That said, I suppose it's hardly worth mentioning Pantload is ill-suited to measure the depths of "creepy," since as far as I'm able to gather, he's failed to distance himself from Rich Lowry for sprouting a chubby during the vice presidential debate.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Not all news in Florida rosy for Obama



Young voters, despite the primary trail enthusiasm, are turning out, in the Sunshine State at least, at typically low levels. Despite an Obama GOTV push aimed at college and university campuses, they’re voting below their statewide percentage numbers in early voting.

Now, that said, I don't know if this is peculiar to Florida, or if youth turnout is at its usual low level across the country in early-voting states.

If it is national, then pollsters probably need to tweak their polls as we head to the finish line.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Time for some Dems and bloggers to eat some Petraeus crow



Less than six months ago, some national Dems and many major Dem-backing MSLBs were calling Gen. David Petraeus an incredibly political general who was in Bush’s hip pocket. Today, many of the same blogs are favorably flagging Petraeus’ expressed desire to open contacts with Syria — but ignoring their own past history on this issue.

(Also, the politicization of Wesley Clark never seems to come up.)

Is that crow I smell on the grill?

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Still plenty of volatility in the electorate



One in seven potential voters (ABC’s poll doesn’t say if they’re likely or not) still haven’t decided their presidential vote.

They’re white centrists, more than the national average. About 40 percent lean Obama, 40 percent McCain and 20 percent say they’re still fully split.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Somebody Went There...



Ahem. And ahem.

To my understanding, Mitch McConnell's sexual orientation has been rather an open secret in the Kentucky political establishment. I tend to think that if gay Republicans maintain what amounts to a civilized stance on gay issues, then they deserve their privacy. If they dedicate their careers to making things really difficult for other gays and lesbians, then I don't have a lot of sympathy. McConnell's position on these questions isn't as bad as some (he's never, as far as I know, demagogued the issue), but it's not good, either.

All that said, the ads linked above are pretty goddamn ugly. They do not in any manner or fashion put the drive for GLBT civil rights in a good light; in fact, just the opposite. While pointing out hypocrisy on this issue is always rather awkward, it can be done in a way that doesn't rely on homophobia to make the point. I certainly hope that Bruce Lunsford had nothing to do with the ads. There's no immediate reason to think that he did; AFSCME sponsored the radio version.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Dallas Morning News goes in financial tank



The Snooze’s parent, A.H. Belo, lost nearly $20 million in the third quarter alone.

Now, a large chunk of that was one-time costs related to employee buyouts which Belo says will save about $30 mil a year in the long term.

I’m guessing the $4.5 million printing press impairment charge is Belo’s write-down of officially shuttering the doors on the Snooze’s south Dallas printing plant site.

But, while Bob Dechard tries to spin the good news, there’s other turds inside the silver lining, including an 11 percent drop in Internet revenue.

Frankly, I have to wonder if closing the Denton Record-Chronicle and rolling it into the News is on the table for discussion.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

House Points: Is Jack Straw the new Sarah Palin?



Today's House Points column from Liberal Democrat News.

A moose in the lobby

Chris Huhne told us in his speech at the Bournemouth Conference that this government has introduced 3,600 new criminal offences since it came to power in 1997. "Labour’s new legislation takes the same amount of shelf space as 200 copies of War and Peace," he said. "And it is twice as heavy as John Prescott."

So it’s no surprise that a few of those offences have slipped through without anyone noticing. At Home Office questions on Monday the Labour MP David Drew raised the case of a friend and constituent who had been arrested at Kingsnorth climate camp for "aggressively picking up litter". Is it any wonder the Wombles are threatening to move to New York?

The work of reducing our liberties is now so great that Gordon Brown has been forced to split it between two cabinet ministers. While Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, was busy at the Commons dispatch box, Jack Straw, as Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, was making a speech down the road at the Royal Society of Arts.

There he invented something called the ‘criminal justice lobby’ and announced that it has been running Britain’s prisons for the past decade. This of nonsense, of course, and not just because it is ministers who runs our prisons. Anyone who works with public sector professionals will know how quickly they come to endorse every new twist of government thinking. They know which side their bread is buttered.

But try telling that to Straw. According to him, the members of this lobby are obsessed with the needs of offenders when they should be worrying about the victims of crime - though he was notably short of practical proposals for helping those victims. More punishment was his recipe. Worse than that, they insist on using long words like "criminogenic".

Believing in left-wing conspiracies, vengeful, anti-intellectual. Does Jack Straw remind you of anyone?

It’s Sarah Palin, of course. If you gave Straw a beehive hairdo and he started wearing his glasses again, it would be impossible to tell them apart. You betcha!

"Now on 'Autumn Watch’ we are going over to Simon King who is with some moose in Blackburn" "Thank you, Bill, and the news here is that the moose are looking distinctly nervous."

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

New info on the real Robinson Crusoe



Although they apparently never met in person, Daniel Defoe clearly patterned his novel after the real-life story of Alexander Selkirk, marooned in 1704 on the is­land of Aguas Bue­nas, since re­named Rob­in­son Cru­soe Is­land, for more than four years.

Read the full story for more on recent archaelogical finds on the island.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Paul – Obama won’t have Iraq troops back in 16 months



Congressman Ron Paul made the prediction Rachel Maddow Show.

And, I’ll give you 50-50 odds he’s right.

Call it another early Intrade.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Conservative Domination of the Federal Courts



As a welcome companion to Steven Calabresi's silly ranting about how -- horrors! -- Barack Obama may completely transform the federal courts (if a whole bunch of relatively young judges retire en masse, of course, Charlie Savage brings some data about the extent to which Bush has transformed the federal courts. Democrats control exactly...one of the 13 federal circuit courts (with 2 being evenly split), and overall Republican appointees represent a whopping 62% of the federal circuit courts. Moreover, these numbers probably understate the reactionary tilt of the federal courts; recent Republican presidents have tended to be much more committed to appointing strong conservatives than Democratic presidents have been to appointing strong liberals.

In his first term, Obama will just be attempting to restore balance to the courts. And what they would look like after a couple more Republican terms is something I don't even want to contemplate. And I hope that Obama will look beyond the cautious moderates he seems attracted to for some appointments.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Time to Talk About NAFTA



A

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Countrywide corruption probe gathering steam



If the investigation pans out, we’ll have a great example of bipartisan corruption that will either demand — and get — real attention from Obama or else be swept under the rug in some way, shape or form.

Among those allegedly benefitting from the Countrywide Financial VIP mortgage program were former Democratic Cabinet members Henry Cisneros, Richard Holbrooke, and Donna Shalala; former GOP Cabinet member Alphonso Jackson and two former CEOs of Fannie Mae — James Johnson and Franklin Raines, heads of the government-sponsored entity which bought Countrywide's mortgages.

If enough of the allegations pan out, look for a big broom sometime next year.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Depends on what the meaning of "convicted" is



Ted Stevens is a real piece of work:
"I've not been convicted yet," Stevens said Thursday in a meeting with the editorial board of the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. "There's not a black mark by my name yet, until the appeal is over and I am finally convicted, if that happens. If that happens, of course I'll do what's right for Alaska and for the Senate. ... I don't anticipate it happening, and until it happens I do not have a black mark."

Stevens reiterated that position during a televised debate late Thursday night, declaring early in the give-and-take with Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich, "I have not been convicted of anything."
Please allow me to translate this into Alaskan for you: So far as Stevens and his supporters are concerned, Alaska has always been regarded as the only legitimate venue for the senator's trial. Other courts, by contrast, carry a degree of legitimacy that's roughly equivalent to the International Criminal Court, or perhaps to the Zinoviev trial. So the fact that Stevens has in fact been convicted of seven felonies is, to a significant percentage of the public completely irrelevant.

I should add that a lot of folks around here are seriously talking about the possibility that Stevens might win re-election and resign at some point in 2009, regardless of the status or outcome of his appeal. In that event, a special election would be scheduled, with Sarah Palin being a likely contender for the seat. I haven't decided yet whether I think this is a likely scenario. Whether or not this actually transpires, though, I suspect a lot of Alaskans are going to vote for Stevens on the assumption that reducing the power of Democrats in the Senate is more important than sparing the state further national embarrassment by electing someone who isn't a crook. And I'd imagine more than a few people will cast votes for Stevens and comfort themselves with the thought that either (a) his conviction will be overturned on appeal, or (b) he'll hold the seat long enough for a stronger Republican to emerge and deny Mark Begich the seat. If a special election were held sometime in 2009, it would be framed as much by anti-Obama/Reid/Pelosi narratives as anything else. And if Senate Democrats have 59-60 seats after Tuesday, such an election would present an opportunity for the RNC to test-market all the insane shit they'll be developing for the mid-term elections in '10.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Petraeus and Syria



I suspect that Eric Martin may be suggesting too much of a distinction here:
ABC News is reporting today that General Petraeus has been pushing for a meeting with Syria's leadership but the Bush administration has refused...

As Daniel Levy mentioned recently, Petraeus and Pentagon leadership have been pleased with recent overtures from the Syrians, and cautiously optimistic about the potential to build on that cooperation...

But then, despite this progress and the continuation of peace talks between Israel and Syria, the Bush administration went ahead with a cross border raid and airstrikes aimed at targets in Syrian territory. Instead of supporting and expanding the diplomatic process, the Bush administration opted for a show of force.

On Tuesday, Eli Lake wrote:
In July, according to three administration sources, the Bush administration formally gave the military new power to strike terrorist safe havens outside of Iraq and Afghanistan. Before then, a military strike in a country like Syria or Pakistan would have required President Bush's personal approval. Now, those kinds of strikes in the region can occur at the discretion of the incoming commander of Central Command (Centcomm), General David Petraeus. One intelligence source described the order as institutionalizing the "Chicago Way," an allusion to Sean Connery's famous soliloquy about bringing a gun to a knife fight.

Eli is Eli, but this certainly seems plausible to me. If it's true, then it means that it's not quite right to say that the Bush administration opted for a show of force in the face of opposition from Petraeus, or least that it may not be true; Petraeus may have ordered the strike himself.

This wouldn't be altogether surprising. As Spencer notes, Petraeus' efforts in Iraq have involved alternation between talks and the use of force. And as Eric wrote, airstrikes don't preclude negotiations. Long story short, I'm not convinced that the airstrike and the negotiation stories are connected in the way that's being suggested here. It's not necessarily true that the airstrike represents a rejection by the administration of the diplomatic option that Petraeus apparently wants to pursue. I'm quite willing to believe that the administration and Petraeus disagree about the value of engaging Syria, but the airstrike doesn't imply that the former is an effort to undercut the latter. As we know from our Schelling, military action is diplomacy; there's no necessary distinction between the two types of effort.

Rather, I would suggest that the crucial insight here is that the administration is restraining Petraeus from undertaking diplomatic efforts towards Syria, while allowing him to use force. This is not a strategy that is likely to work, and it's an approach that I expect would change under an Obama administration. We may well still see these kinds of strikes, but I expect they'll be accompanied by genuine efforts at diplomatic accomodation.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Antarctic melting too



We’ve got the first solid scientific evidence that global warming is hitting both poles, not just the Arctic.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

4 Days And Counting - The 14 Speeches of the Obama Campaign: #4, Securing The Pledged Delegate Lead



May 20, 2008, Des Moines, Iowa-Securing the Pledged Delegate Lead



technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Revisting Roe's Status



Kay Steiger has an excellent article about how vulnerable Roe is under the current Supreme Court, which quotes yours truly. The bottom line for me remains that the argument that Roe's overturn is imminent depends on the belief that Kennedy has changed, and I just don't think there's any evidence that he has. To add a couple of points:

  • Leaving aside the question of how "political" we can expect the Court to be, I don't understand why a politically savvy court would wait until Democrats hostile to their views controlled every branch of the federal government to overturn Roe. I don't see how it becomes any better for the GOP to overturn Roe explicitly in 2010 than it is now. If anything, a politically savvy Court would have seen 2008 as a likely Democatic year anyway and gotten it over with if it wanted to do it.
  • The idea that Roe would be explicitly overturned also ignores the extent to which Alito and Roberts have gone out of their way to nominally "uphold" precedents they're not seriously applying. If they're not willing to explicitly overturn precedents that almost nobody in the general public cares about, they're certainly not going to be anxious to do so on a high-salience issue where such an outcome would be very unpopular.
None of this is to say that I'm sanguine about women's access to abortion in this country. It's important to remember how much damage can be done to abortion access without Roe being overturned. And if a court gets more Republican appointments, that's a different matter entirely. But the Court as currently configured isn't going to explicitly announce the overruling of Roe v. Wade.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

The way we live now



I imagine my own experience with blogging isn't unusual for someone of my age and background. I think I first heard the word "blog" around 2001 or 2002. I don't think I started reading any blogs until a year or so after that -- Josh Marshall, Billmon, and Sullivan are the first I remember looking at.

But I didn't start reading them regularly until the fall of 2004 and the presidential campaign. Then I got hooked and the blog world became part of my regular routine.

One thing I don't have a good sense of is what percentage of politically engaged people are now regular blog readers? Anecdotally it seems very high, but that's just based on people I know. I suppose there's lots of data on this, which I'm too lazy to look for before a second cup of coffee.

Anyway the point of this rambling, to the extent it has any, is to wonder what effect the blogosphere has had on the way people think about politics. Surely it has made them (us) better informed in certain ways -- I barely looked at the internet for about the past 36 hours because of various commitments, and this morning I was struck by how much sheer information is reported, digested, critiqued, meta-analyzed etc. in that space of time -- and maybe its biggest strength is that it has made people much more sophisticated consumers of media as media.

On the other hand Rob's post below about Thucydides reminds me that one thing this little world of ours seems not to produce much of is the kind of analysis that isn't driven by the political demands of the moment. This isn't a Broderesque lament for faux-centerist "non-partisanship." It's just a bit of complaining about how too many things in the blog world are instantly transformed into the kind of argument that always seems to be happening between zealots on issues like abortion or Israel/Palestine, where one's opponents are always a bunch of evil idiots, as opposed to people very much like oneself who just happen to be working from different (non-refutable needless to say) first principles.

Maybe this will change as the medium matures. Didn't newspapers start out as mostly more or less scandal sheets and tools of libelous invective? (I don't actually know, but I have a vague impression along those lines). Now a couple of hundred years later we have both the New York Post and the New York Times. For awhile more anyway.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Dude, that's Harsh



Ouch:
Asked by the host whether Palin could step in during a time of crisis, [Lawrence] Eagleburger reverted to sarcasm before leveling the harsh blow.

"It is a very good question," he said, pausing a few seconds, then adding with a chuckle: "I'm being facetious here. Look, of course not."

Eagleburger explained: "I don't think at the moment she is prepared to take over the reigns of the presidency. I can name for you any number of other vice presidents who were not particularly up to it either. So the question, I think, is can she learn and would she be tough enough under the circumstances if she were asked to become president, heaven forbid that that ever takes place?

"Give her some time in the office and I think the answer would be, she will be [pause] adequate. I can't say that she would be a genius in the job. But I think she would be enough to get us through a four year... well I hope not... get us through whatever period of time was necessary. And I devoutly hope that it would never be tested."

Why do Barack Obama and his surrogates have to be so cruel? Obama should call up Larry Eagleburger and say "Thanks, but no thanks for the support you've given my campaign thus far." That's the only way to deal with out-of-control campaign surrogates who stray off message. Seriously, can you imagine a McCain surrogate saying something like that?

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

The real tragedy of Obama-Khalidi — pandering



Is what’s in the original L.A. Times story besides what’s on the “controversial” tape of Obama’s visit at Khalidi’s farewell to Chicago dinner. And, that “rest of the story” is the degree Obama was in the pocket of the Israel lobby long before being elected to the Senate
Already in 2000, for example, he wrote a policy paper supporting a unified Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Now, as to the WHY of that paper, it’s obvious. He was currying Jewish votes in his House primary run against Bobby Rush.

In other words, already in 2000, Obama, while trying to be connected with people who were more truly progressive, was currying favors with neolib types at the same time.

His 2002 signup for an Illinois statehouse resolution calling on Palestinians to renounce violence? More of the same, coupled with his partially political antiwar speech and seeing Illinois about to go Democratic in state government.

Just.Another.Politician.™

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Notice Something?



While Senator Obama's speaking in front of tens of thousands of people, the formerly honorable John McCain is having trouble finding six thousand.

From MSNBC yesterday:
A local school district official confirmed after the event that of the 6,000 people estimated by the fire marshal to be in attendance this morning, more than 4,000 were bused in from schools in the area. The entire 2,500-student Defiance School District was in attendance, the official said, in addition to at least three other schools from neighboring districts, one of which sent 14 buses.
A week before the election and he can't scrape together six thousand people in Ohio?

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

McCain Latest Vile Smear



From the Washington Post:

With the presidential campaign clock ticking down, Sen. John McCain has suddenly discovered a new boogeyman to link to Sen. Barack Obama: a sometimes controversial but widely respected Middle East scholar named Rashid Khalidi. In the past couple of days, Mr. McCain and his running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin, have likened Mr. Khalidi, the director of a Middle East institute at Columbia University, to neo-Nazis; called him "a PLO spokesman"; and suggested that the Los Angeles Times is hiding something sinister by refusing to release a videotape of a 2003 dinner in honor of Mr. Khalidi at which Mr. Obama spoke. Mr. McCain even threw former Weatherman Bill Ayers into the mix, suggesting that the tape might reveal that Mr. Ayers -- a terrorist-turned-professor who also has been an Obama acquaintance -- was at the dinner.

For the record, Mr. Khalidi is an American born in New York who graduated from Yale a couple of years after George W. Bush. For much of his long academic career, he taught at the University of Chicago, where he and his wife became friends with Barack and Michelle Obama. In the early 1990s, he worked as an adviser to the Palestinian delegation at peace talks in Madrid and Washington sponsored by the first Bush administration. We don't agree with a lot of what Mr. Khalidi has had to say about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over the years, and Mr. Obama has made clear that he doesn't, either. But to compare the professor to neo-Nazis -- or even to Mr. Ayers -- is a vile smear. [emphasis added]

Josh Marshall has more:
The McCain campaign has been throwing around so much mud and smears in recent weeks that it's easy to miss just how ugly and shameful their character assassination of Rashid Khalidi is. This is an entirely respectable, highly respected scholar. To go further into making a case for him would only be to enable and indulge McCain's sordid appeal to racism. For McCain, personally, to compare Khalidi to a neo-nazi, it's just an offense McCain should never be forgiven for. It's right down in the gutter with Joe McCarthy and the worst of the worst.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the formerly honorable John McCain.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Richard Grayson on televison



Richard Grayson, Lib Dem PPC for Hemel Hempstead and formerly Charles Kennedy's head honcho, will be appearing on television on Wednesday 5 November.

The Hemel Hempstead Gazette says:

Dr Richard Grayson, 39, will feature in My Family at War, which explores the family history of celebrities whose relatives fought in World War One.

The makers of tonight's episode, that focuses on TV presenter Eamonn Holmes, called on Dr Grayson for his detailed knowledge of the experiences of Catholic soldiers in Belfast.

The programme will be shown on BBC1 at 10.45 p.m. on Wednesday 5 November.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

How Can We Forget You if You Won't Go Away?



Shorter Verbatim Bob Kerrey: "Obama understands that to succeed, he must make peace with John McCain just as he has done with Hillary Clinton. When this historic election concludes, I expect the two to sit down, without precondition, and negotiate an agenda of reform."

Admittedly, I'm not opposed to any such discussion that begins (and ends) with Obama saying "Here's my offer: nothing. Not even the fee for the gaming license, which I would appreciate if you would sell one of your 13 houses to put up personally." Students who have watched Kerrey perfect the the all-too-active art of concern trolling will not be surprised to learn, however, that the "reforms" Kerrey seems to have in mind involve Obama agreeing to implement Republican fiscal policies using feeble Republican talking points...

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

A Brief Note



Based on personal and other anecdotal experience, I would have to say that SuperShuttle is pretty much the worst thing ever. If I understand correctly, the deal is that you add about four hours on to your travel time to save about six bucks (or, in New York, pay significantly more for something that actually takes significantly longer than public transportation to most places.) I'm permanently inclined to pass...

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

A Simulation



We may never get to see the lost Farley/Goldfarb tapes, although I've heard rumors of a bootleg annotated by Greil Marcus turning up at Bleeker Street Records. But I assume the missing footage went a little something like this.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Conscientious nonvoting



It's more than a little cheesy for my first post here to refer to my own blog, but there's a conversation brewing there that might be of interest. Feel free to jump in.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Bucks County points to Obama win



Bucks County, Pa. has a reputation as a voting bellwether. Well, if that's the case, Obama can get out the champagne. And, maybe bigotry is at least lessening in many areas, too.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Easy Answers To Questions Asked By People Inexplicably Entertaining Desperate Hackery



John Dickerson:

The McCain campaign is unusually upbeat. Does it have reason to be?

No.
This has been...

In addition to which, since when is it "unusual" for presidential campaigns to be "upbeat?" What do you expect a spin doctor to say? "John, we're completely screwed. We'd sign for Dukakis' electoral college tally right now." These guys are paid to be upbeat.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Tony Pua "Slams" The Star?



Thanks to the Star for carrying my statement today, but I must say the headline "DAP slams PAS outburst over bumi equity issue" was certainly made to incite controversy. If you read the report, and my actual statement blogged here, it's criticism yes, but "slam"?

I've "slammed" BN and the Government many times in my statements, I've never read a report entitled "DAP slams the Prime Minister...". Sdr Lim Kit Siang has "slammed" BN, it compoment parties and many of the Ministers, e.g., over the recent Eurocopter and ValueCap controversy cases, but no, no such report of "DAP slams Minister of Finance..."

But giving constructive criticism to our Pakatan partners, it's "slam". Sigh. Well, beggars can't be choosers, The Star gives you publicity, we'll just have to look at it on the bright side ;-)

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Women of the media shine



No, this isn't a lead-in for some new Playboy issue. Instead, it's a heads-up for a good new Salon article about female talking heads moving to the front of the electronic media class. Couric, Brown and Maddow are all profiled.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Libertarian reading list



Courtesy of libertarian legal theorist Stephan Kinsella:

The following are listed in the order I would recommend reading them, or in order of appropriateness for an introductory text:

    1.    Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt.

    2.    For a New Liberty by Murray N. Rothbard.

    3.    The Machinery of Freedom by David Friedman (Milton's son).

    4.    Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.

    5.    The Virtue of Selfishness and Capitalism:  The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand.

    These are probably the most important ones.  Other good introductory books are:

    6.    Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose by Milton Friedman.

    7.    The Law by Frederick Bastiat.

    8.    In Pursuit:  of Happiness and Good Government by Charles Murray.

    9.    Libertarianism in One Lesson, 5th edition (1990) by David Bergland.

    10.    The Libertarian Alternative, collection of essays edited by Tibor Machan.

    11.    The Free Market Reader edited by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

    12.    Libertarianism by John Hospers (though I have never read this one).

    13.    The Freedom Philosophy, collection of essays published by the Foundation for Economic Education.

    How about some excellent libertarian fiction (I already mentioned Atlas Shrugged):

    14.    The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand.  Also We, the Living and Anthem.

    15.    The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein, the grandmaster of science fiction.

    16.    Alongside Night by J. Neil Schulman.

    For some more sophistocated books, past the introductory level, I would recommend highly these:

    17.    Anarchy, State and Utopia by Robert Nozick.

    18.    A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism:  Economics, Politics and Ethics, and The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

    19.    The Ethics of Liberty by Murray Rothbard.

    20.    The Market for Liberty by Morris and Linda Tannehill.

    21.    Freedom and the Law by Bruno Leoni.

    22.    The Libertarian Idea by Jan Narveson.

    23.    Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community by Loren Lomasky.

    24.    "Ordering Rights Consistently:  Or What We Do and Do Not Have Rights To," by Roger A. Pilon, in 13 Georgia Law Review 1171 (1979).

    25.    Human Rights and Human Liberties and Individuals and Their Rights by Tibor Machan.

    26.    The God of the Machine by Isabel Paterson.

    27.    The Discovery of Freedom by Rose Wilder Lane (mother of Laura Ingalls Wilder, who wrote the Little House on the Prairie series)


technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

States consider many ballot propositions



There's plenty besides presidential, senatorial and congressional races on state and local ballots this year.

They include a clean energy initiative in Missouri, a "right to die" measure in Washington State, legalization of prostitution in San Francisco, affirmative-action bans in multiple states, a LA-Bay Area high-speed rail bond issue in California, and more.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

The End Of America's Longest War?



Hat tip: a JJP reader


From The Daily Dish

30 Oct 2008 12:40 pm
The End Of America's Longest War?


A reader writes:

Earlier this week, in your post “The Top Ten Reasons Conservatives Should Vote For Obama”, you wrote under Point 4: “A truce in the culture war. Obama takes us past the debilitating boomer warfare that has raged since the 1960s. Nothing has distorted our politics so gravely; nothing has made a rational politics more elusive.”



On the one hand I agree with you; on the other hand, you don't go nearly far enough. An Obama presidency means much more than a truce in the 60’s culture war. It means the end of a much older and more terrible war, in which the 60's was merely one battle: the American Civil War. That is what is at stake here.

The Civil War was fought from Sumter to Appomattox, from April 12, 1861, to April 9, 1865. But the roots of the war predated 1861, and the consequences lived on long after 1865. In reality the Civil War never ended, it just shifted from a military to a culture war - the same culture war that is still going on today.

What you call the “boomer warfare” of the 1960’s was part of that larger war, marking the struggle to end Jim Crow, the century-long regime of American apartheid (Vietnam was, in my opinion, related but secondary). The end of apartheid was a second humiliating defeat for the forces of the conservative "South" at the hands of the liberal "North", and it subsequently gave rise to those decades of distorted and irrational politics you so deplore, as the reactionary and fundamentalist forces regrouped and mounted yet another rearguard insurrection against their liberal "oppressors", culminating in their partial ascension to power under Bush. (And we can only hope it ends there, instead of with Palin and the Christian Nationalists in 2012).


I realize this may sound harsh; I do not think Bush is a racist, for instance (quite the contrary), and I am very aware of the progress made in this country since I was young, including in the South; nevertheless, this election is clearly about race, about who and what we are as a nation, as a people, as a family (I would throw California's Prop 8 squarely into this battle too).

So let's be clear - it is not "boomer warfare" which has distorted our politics, or made rational politics so elusive since the 60's: it is something far deeper, something far older, something which has been with us from the beginning in this country, and which we in turn brought with us from the Old World; something which in fact traces back to the very origin of humanity - spiritually, psychologically, politically, evolutionarily. That depth is what gives the American story its pathos and its importance. That is why the world watches us: to see if we can work it out - to see if there is hope.
And that's why January 20, 2009, is so important: the day Barack Obama is sworn in as our 44th president will mark the third, and I believe the final defeat of the forces of repression and division in this country, and the actual end of the American Civil War.

How can I be so sure? Because when the American President is inaugurated, it is directly homologous to the crowning of the King in ancient days: the King is the groom, the Nation is the bride, the crowning is the hieros gamos, the sacred marriage. When Barack Obama is sworn in as our 44th president, a symbolic marriage will be enacted, binding us together forever, black and white. We will have chosen to become one. We will have chosen to become family. The War will be over. E pluribus unum.

The whole world will be watching this. You have stated over and over again that an Obama presidency would be “transformational”, even “indispensable”. You're right. And you're right that this is only the beginning. A new chapter is dawning.

Will the old guard resist? Of course. But their power is waning. Providence made sure the better man lost in 2000, and the eight years since have been just enough rope for the old, corrupt right to hang itself.


It's observations like this that make me love the internet. Just the possibility that I could come across something that would make me go ' Damn'.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

GM wants more fed money pounded down rathole



UAW chief still clueless on formerly-Big Three or nobody

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm has joined five other state leaders in asking for federal bailout money to go directly to the U.S. auto industry.

First, it's really credit card companies and banks wanting the money; that's why the governors of Delaware, New York and South Dakota are co-signers of the request.

Second, plenty of questions, and doubt, remain about the prime idea of a GM-Chrysler merger.

If consolidation of the two companies involved selling off all non-Jeep divisions of Chrysler, how well would that help? Especially if gas prices go back up as the country comes out on the far side of recession and SUV sales stay low?

That's just one of many non sequiturs of a possible merger that the article above raises.

Third, the UAW apparently Second, just doeesn't get it. Even if not a GM-Chrysler merger, somebody is likely to buy somebody within the auto world (Nissan has also been a suitor for Chrysler, for example) and more jobs will go away.

Especially when Ron Gettelfinger pins the hope of U.S. auto revival on the sale of more SUVs, it's clear he's a dinosaur, if not quite, or not necessarily, an idiot.

And, I did not link the the Dallas Morning Snooze on this; despite GM having a plant in Arlington, the Snooze ran a wire story.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Britblog Roundup: A reminder



I shall be hosting the next Britblog Roundup this weekend.

If you have seen a posting on a British blog this week (including your own) that you think particularly fine, please send the link to britblog [at] gmail [dot] com by Sunday lunchtime.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Revenge of the Telford penguins?



Remember the fiasco of the Telford penguins and the Tory-run council's policy of challenging any lone adults found in the town park in case they are paedophiles? Let me refresh your memory.

Anyway, Telford & Wrekin Council Watch points us to a story in the Telford Journal, which gives the intriguing latest chapter in this story:

Conservative Councillor Denis Allen was suddenly axed from his cabinet position this week as member for community services.

Last week it was revealed Councillor Allen was taking a month-long break from his role, prompting rumours that he had been suspended.

Telford & Wrekin, however, put out a statement saying Councillor Allen had been advised to take a “well deserved rest.”

And there's more:
now the leader of the Labour group, Keith Austin, says Councillor Allen had come under fire - and was under investigation - over the Telford Town Park paedophile fiasco.

He was the one who authorised routine stop-checks on single people walking in the park’s recreational areas, claimed Councillor Austin.


technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

This Halloween, don’t forget to be a Global Citizen



A

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

'Obama is a Muslim' e-mail rumors work!



At least here in Texas, where 23 percent of not just random Texans but registered voters believe he's a Muslim.

Yes, everything is bigger in Texas, including the nutbarrery level.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

‘Hell House’ gets protest – from another church



The famous, or infamous, Hell House at Trinity Church in Cedar Hill has drawn a protest from another Dallas-area church – onsite at Trinity:
Members of a separate North Texas church are so upset about a controversial haunted house, they gathered Wednesday to protest outside the house.

“We are just appalled,” said Tommy Houghteling with First United Methodist Church in Richardson.

Houghteling told CBS 11 News that the message Trinity Church is sending to the young members is that if you struggle with certain issues then God has no place for you.

Apparently, the protest included “flipping the bird” at Trinity by one protestor.

I should have pix later.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Pilgrim chickening out



It looks like Pilgrim’s Pride, founded by iconic pitchman Bo Pilgrim, is headed for bankruptcy.

Pilgrim’s Pride, the nation’s No. 1 chicken “producer,” has been hammered by the high price of corn. And now, with the credit crunch, even if somebody wanted to buy it, they might not be able to get the money.

So, get ready for a flood of cheap chicken soon.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

LeBron to LA?



Not a chance, despite any speculation Adrian Wojnarowski reports over at Yahoo Sports. Dinero and cap would be tough enough, but, what if LBJ shows up Kobe? Would he live with it, or pout?

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Things that Please Me About the Phillies Win



I am pleased that Jamie Moyer will receive a World Series ring. I have no idea how many games I watched Moyer start at Safeco and the Kingdome, but it's not a small number. I wish it could have happened in 2001, but congrats nevertheless.

I am also pleased that Geoff Jenkins will receive a World Series ring. There's just something kind of cool about a guy you knew in 3rd grade winning the World Series. Congrats, Jaffo.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

The Economist Endorses Barack Obama



Yes, that bastion of socialism, THE ECONOMIST, endorses Barack Obama.

The presidential election

It's time
Oct 30th 2008
From The Economist print edition

America should take a chance and make Barack Obama the next leader of the free world


IT IS impossible to forecast how important any presidency will be. Back in 2000 America stood tall as the undisputed superpower, at peace with a generally admiring world. The main argument was over what to do with the federal government’s huge budget surplus. Nobody foresaw the seismic events of the next eight years. When Americans go to the polls next week the mood will be very different. The United States is unhappy, divided and foundering both at home and abroad. Its self-belief and values are under attack.

For all the shortcomings of the campaign, both John McCain and Barack Obama offer hope of national redemption. Now America has to choose between them. The Economist does not have a vote, but if it did, it would cast it for Mr Obama. We do so wholeheartedly: the Democratic candidate has clearly shown that he offers the better chance of restoring America’s self-confidence. But we acknowledge it is a gamble. Given Mr Obama’s inexperience, the lack of clarity about some of his beliefs and the prospect of a stridently Democratic Congress, voting for him is a risk. Yet it is one America should take, given the steep road ahead.

Thinking about 2009 and 2017
The immediate focus, which has dominated the campaign, looks daunting enough: repairing America’s economy and its international reputation. The financial crisis is far from finished. The United States is at the start of a painful recession. Some form of further fiscal stimulus is needed, though estimates of the budget deficit next year already spiral above $1 trillion. Some 50m Americans have negligible health-care cover. Abroad, even though troops are dying in two countries, the cack-handed way in which George Bush has prosecuted his war on terror has left America less feared by its enemies and less admired by its friends than it once was.

Yet there are also longer-term challenges, worth stressing if only because they have been so ignored on the campaign. Jump forward to 2017, when the next president will hope to relinquish office. A combination of demography and the rising costs of America’s huge entitlement programmes—Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid—will be starting to bankrupt the country. Abroad a greater task is already evident: welding the new emerging powers to the West. That is not just a matter of handling the rise of India and China, drawing them into global efforts, such as curbs on climate change; it means reselling economic and political freedom to a world that too quickly associates American capitalism with Lehman Brothers and American justice with Guantánamo Bay. This will take patience, fortitude, salesmanship and strategy.

At the beginning of this election year, there were strong arguments against putting another Republican in the White House. A spell in opposition seemed apt punishment for the incompetence, cronyism and extremism of the Bush presidency. Conservative America also needs to recover its vim. Somehow Ronald Reagan’s party of western individualism and limited government has ended up not just increasing the size of the state but turning it into a tool of southern-fried moralism.

The selection of Mr McCain as the Republicans’ candidate was a powerful reason to reconsider. Mr McCain has his faults: he is an instinctive politician, quick to judge and with a sharp temper. And his age has long been a concern (how many global companies in distress would bring in a new 72-year-old boss?). Yet he has bravely taken unpopular positions—for free trade, immigration reform, the surge in Iraq, tackling climate change and campaign-finance reform. A western Republican in the Reagan mould, he has a long record of working with both Democrats and America’s allies.

If only the real John McCain had been running
That, however, was Senator McCain; the Candidate McCain of the past six months has too often seemed the victim of political sorcery, his good features magically inverted, his bad ones exaggerated. The fiscal conservative who once tackled Mr Bush over his unaffordable tax cuts now proposes not just to keep the cuts, but to deepen them. The man who denounced the religious right as “agents of intolerance” now embraces theocratic culture warriors. The campaigner against ethanol subsidies (who had a better record on global warming than most Democrats) came out in favour of a petrol-tax holiday. It has not all disappeared: his support for free trade has never wavered. Yet rather than heading towards the centre after he won the nomination, Mr McCain moved to the right.

Meanwhile his temperament, always perhaps his weak spot, has been found wanting. Sometimes the seat-of-the-pants method still works: his gut reaction over Georgia—to warn Russia off immediately—was the right one. Yet on the great issue of the campaign, the financial crisis, he has seemed all at sea, emitting panic and indecision. Mr McCain has never been particularly interested in economics, but, unlike Mr Obama, he has made little effort to catch up or to bring in good advisers (Doug Holtz-Eakin being the impressive exception).

The choice of Sarah Palin epitomised the sloppiness. It is not just that she is an unconvincing stand-in, nor even that she seems to have been chosen partly for her views on divisive social issues, notably abortion. Mr McCain made his most important appointment having met her just twice.

Ironically, given that he first won over so many independents by speaking his mind, the case for Mr McCain comes down to a piece of artifice: vote for him on the assumption that he does not believe a word of what he has been saying. Once he reaches the White House, runs this argument, he will put Mrs Palin back in her box, throw away his unrealistic tax plan and begin negotiations with the Democratic Congress. That is plausible; but it is a long way from the convincing case that Mr McCain could have made. Had he become president in 2000 instead of Mr Bush, the world might have had fewer problems. But this time it is beset by problems, and Mr McCain has not proved that he knows how to deal with them.

Is Mr Obama any better? Most of the hoopla about him has been about what he is, rather than what he would do. His identity is not as irrelevant as it sounds. Merely by becoming president, he would dispel many of the myths built up about America: it would be far harder for the spreaders of hate in the Islamic world to denounce the Great Satan if it were led by a black man whose middle name is Hussein; and far harder for autocrats around the world to claim that American democracy is a sham. America’s allies would rally to him: the global electoral college on our website shows a landslide in his favour. At home he would salve, if not close, the ugly racial wound left by America’s history and lessen the tendency of American blacks to blame all their problems on racism.

So Mr Obama’s star quality will be useful to him as president. But that alone is not enough to earn him the job. Charisma will not fix Medicare nor deal with Iran. Can he govern well? Two doubts present themselves: his lack of executive experience; and the suspicion that he is too far to the left.

There is no getting around the fact that Mr Obama’s résumé is thin for the world’s biggest job. But the exceptionally assured way in which he has run his campaign is a considerable comfort. It is not just that he has more than held his own against Mr McCain in the debates. A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.

Political fire, far from rattling Mr Obama, seems to bring out the best in him: the furore about his (admittedly ghastly) preacher prompted one of the most thoughtful speeches of the campaign. On the financial crisis his performance has been as assured as Mr McCain’s has been febrile. He seems a quick learner and has built up an impressive team of advisers, drawing in seasoned hands like Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. Of course, Mr Obama will make mistakes; but this is a man who listens, learns and manages well.

It is hard too nowadays to depict him as soft when it comes to dealing with America’s enemies. Part of Mr Obama’s original appeal to the Democratic left was his keenness to get American troops out of Iraq; but since the primaries he has moved to the centre, pragmatically saying the troops will leave only when the conditions are right. His determination to focus American power on Afghanistan, Pakistan and proliferation was prescient. He is keener to talk to Iran than Mr McCain is— but that makes sense, providing certain conditions are met.

Our main doubts about Mr Obama have to do with the damage a muddle-headed Democratic Congress might try to do to the economy. Despite the protectionist rhetoric that still sometimes seeps into his speeches, Mr Obama would not sponsor a China-bashing bill. But what happens if one appears out of Congress? Worryingly, he has a poor record of defying his party’s baronies, especially the unions. His advisers insist that Mr Obama is too clever to usher in a new age of over-regulation, that he will stop such nonsense getting out of Congress, that he is a political chameleon who would move to the centre in Washington. But the risk remains that on economic matters the centre that Mr Obama moves to would be that of his party, not that of the country as a whole.

He has earned it
So Mr Obama in that respect is a gamble. But the same goes for Mr McCain on at least as many counts, not least the possibility of President Palin. And this cannot be another election where the choice is based merely on fear. In terms of painting a brighter future for America and the world, Mr Obama has produced the more compelling and detailed portrait. He has campaigned with more style, intelligence and discipline than his opponent. Whether he can fulfil his immense potential remains to be seen. But Mr Obama deserves the presidency.


technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

A Friendly Homecoming for Ted



Morons, all of them:
There was undisguised hostility toward the federal government and the FBI at the Stevens event, with people wearing T-shirts that said "F*#@ the feds, vote for Ted."

"Anyone who thinks you can get a fair trial in the heart of liberalism, Washington, D.C., is smoking dope. He was railroaded," said Mark Kelliher, a retired engineer.

Talk radio host Rick Rydell told the crowd he knows Stevens, a D.C. jury doesn't.

"I don't particularly like it when outsiders tell me what to do," Rydell said, before Stevens took the stage. "You can kiss my Alaska moose-hunting behind."

Stevens reiterated his innocence, assured his supporters that he would be vindicated on appeal, and said he's still the best choice for Alaska. Stevens said that when he filed his financial disclosure forms, he believed they were accurate and complete.

"The verdict was driven by prosecutors who were willing to do anything to win. If I had a fair trial in Alaska, I would have been acquitted," he said.
I've had a difficult time explaining to non-Alaskans lately why it is that Ted Stevens stands a decent chance at being elected as a recently-convicted felon. The polls are still tilting ever so slightly in Mark Begich's favor, but the last three close elections in Alaska -- Frank Murkowski's win in 2002, Lisa Murkowski's victory in 2004 and Palin's win in 2006 -- have shown a tendency for Republican candidates to outperform the polls. In those cases, of course, the Republicans were leading heading into election day and emerged with wider margins of victory than expected. I'm not sure how well that trend (such as it is) applies to this race; a lot of Alaskans are embarrassed by Stevens, and his opponent is really competent and popular, so that might be enough. But there's no way to overstate how solid Ted Stevens' support is among a vast portion of the state's population who are quite comfortable with Stevens' efforts to "spread the wealth" northward from the Lower 48. It's not difficult to run into people -- intelligent, otherwise sensible people -- who argue with a straight face and a pure heart that Ted Stevens somehow deserved $250,000 worth of free stuff as a reward for his four decades of service to the state. This is someone who has a international fucking airport named after him.

But sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If Ted Stevens deserves a quarter of a million dollars worth of stuff as a reward for his years of public service, I figure that after six years of hard, underpaid labor on behalf of Alaska's youth, I at least deserve one of the laser printers that I'm currently sharing with a few dozen of my colleagues.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

The Infomercial



I was working so have only seen brief excerpts -- was it this good? Certainly, Tom Brady is even better than Katarina Witt. (I'm guessing that very few people still wish that Mark Penn was running the Democratic campaign...)

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Get Out The Vote Kickoff with Rusted Root



Today, October 30th, please join Pittsburgh for Obama
for a Get Out the Vote Kickoff at Heinz Field,
featuring a special musical performance by Rusted Root.


Get Out The Vote Kickoff
with Rusted Root

Heinz Field
100 Art Rooney Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15212

Thursday, October 30th
8:00 p.m.


http://pa.barackobama.com/PittsburghKickoff

The event is free and open to the public.
Tickets are not required; however,
an RSVP is strongly encouraged.
.


technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Friedman – let Iran stew in low oil prices, then negotiate



Thomas Friedman says the mullahs, and Iranian regime frontman Mahmoud Ahmadinejd, are in the same spot as the Shah circa 1979.

The heavy subsidies in the Iranian economy are now untenable. Soon, Teheran is going to be begging for help.

Let them beg, then start talking, Friedman says.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

Nir Rosen: The Worst American Journalist Since Jane Fonda



Lots of commentary on Bing West's attack on Nir Rosen today; see especially Ackerman and Abu M.

A couple points of my own:

It's obviously different in a lot of ways, but if we didn't have war correspondents embedding in the forces of the enemy, we wouldn't have History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides was an Athenian general before he was a historian. While it's fair enough to note that Nir Rosen has yet to be exiled for his failure to prevent the seizure of Amphipolis, it's also true that Thucydides believed that his ability to observe both Spartan and Athenian forces was critical to the History:
It was also my fate to be an exile from my country for twenty years after my command at Amphipolis; and being present with both parties, and more especially with the Peloponnesians by reason of my exile, I had leisure to observe affairs somewhat particularly.
This isn't terribly surprising; perspective requires knowledge. If History of the Peloponnesian War read as a patriotic account of stalwart Athenians defeating tyrannical Spartans (or vice versa) then no one but classicists would read it today. It's strength comes from Thucydides ability to observe the motives, behavior, and self-justifications of both sides; his analysis of why the war happened and how it was conducted depends on a degree of empathy with both Athenian and Spartan interests.

Second, this point by West is simply nonsensical:
Rosen described how he and two Taliban fighters deceived the guards at a government checkpoint. Suppose during World War II an American reporter had sneaked through the lines with two German officers wearing civilian clothes. “When we caught enemy combatants out of uniform in the 1940s,” a veteran wrote in The American Heritage, “we sometimes simply executed them.” The Greatest Generation had a direct way of dealing with moral ambiguity.

Yeah... and what if a Nazi functionary had allowed an American journalist to visit Auschwitz in early 1942? It's equally absurd, but as long as we're making things up let's consider a scenario that weighs rather heavily in favor of allowing journalists to embed with the enemy. It doesn't even occur to West that reporting on the enemy doesn't imply approval of enemy activities; that he compares the behavior of Rosen (a journalist) to Jane Fonda (not a journalist) indicates that he really doesn't understand what journalism is.

It's certainly possible to develop scenarios in which the professional identity of "journalist"-- to say nothing of "scholar", "lawyer", or even "soldier"-- runs counter to the other commitments that we have. Such conflicts are part of life, and can't be wished away. I don't find Rosen's behavior, however, even close to troubling; his work opened a window into how the Taliban functions, how its warriors think, and why they're willing to die for what they believe in. To the extent that West believes that the destruction of the Taliban is a desirable goal, he should be thankful that Rosen has provided this window, and should devote his efforts to using the information as effectively as possible.

Either that, or he can engage in rambling, pointless bluster about how in the old days, we earned our moral clarity by shootin' folks. Your call, Bing.

...Shorter Bing:


technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley

GOP pork threatens Galveston and could be nonfunctional



But, nonetheless, Bush, Tom DeLay and Kay Bailey Cheerleader all favored building a hazardous biomaterials lab — a major one, with majorly hazardous critters like Ebola — on Galveston Island.

Hurricane Ike has already shown just how stupid that decision was:
“It’s crazy, in my mind,” said Jim Blackburn, an environmental lawyer in Houston. “I just find an amazing willingness among the people on the Texas coast to accept risks that a lot of people in the country would not accept.”

Now, among the safety features, they include shutting down all experiments 24 hours before a hurricane landfall.

But, if it were built somewhere else…

You wouldn’ have to do that!

The claim that politics had nothing to do with the location is laughable.

technorati tags:
| |
More at: News 2 Cromley